Systematic reviews and clinical trials form the cornerstone of contemporary health research, providing robust, evidence‐based insights that guide clinical practice and policy. Systematic reviews ...

Systematic reviews are fundamental to the appraisal and synthesis of evidence in health and social care. They utilise pre‐defined protocols to gather, evaluate and integrate findings from diverse ...

There is no clear evidence that cannabis-based medicines provide pain relief for chronic neuropathic pain, an updated review ...

An ad hoc committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will produce a report to update the standards for systematic reviews as defined in the 2011 report Finding What ...

Background While female sex has historically been associated with worse outcomes following surgical aortic valve replacement, ...

A systematic review of 45 studies found that physicians perceive one in six patient visits in non-psychiatric clinics as ...

A systematic review found high return to sport after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, with similar outcomes across implant ...

Objective To synthesise data on the associations between cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and health in children and adolescents, evaluate the certainty of evidence and identify knowledge gaps. Design ...

Oncoscope launches the first Real-time, AI-supported Living Systematic Literature Review designed for enterprise-wide ...

Despite rapid advances in large language models, this study shows that human expertise remains critical for producing rigorous systematic reviews, with AI best suited as a supervised support tool ...

Objective To examine the comprehensive health impacts of exercise on people with cancer by systematically summarising existing evidence and assessing the strength and reliability of the associations.